PunterStorySearch

Thirty Years in the Ring: An On-Course Bookmaker Tells All

From bags of cash at Moonee Valley to betting apps and data feeds — a bookie on everything that's changed and the one thing that hasn't.

Jack DoyleFeature Writer
Thirty Years in the Ring: An On-Course Bookmaker Tells All
Editorial artwork

He asked us not to use his name, then spent three hours telling stories that make anonymity pointless to anyone who stood in the Moonee Valley ring in the nineties. We'll call him M.

M's first day as a licensed bookmaker was a wet Wednesday in 1994. He lost eleven thousand dollars and drove home, he says, 'happier than I'd ever been in my life. I was in the game.'

What changed

'The phones killed the walk-up punter, the data killed the mug price, and the corporates killed the ring. In that order.' M says the modern on-course bookie survives on service and theatre: 'People bet with me for the same reason they buy records. It feels like something.'

The sharpest change, he says, is information symmetry. 'In 1995 I knew things the crowd didn't. Now the kid with the phone knows things I don't. The margin used to be knowledge. Now it's nerve.'

Thirty Years in the Ring: An On-Course Bookmaker Tells All — editorial artwork
Editorial artwork

What hasn't changed

'Greed. Hope. The bloke who has one good Saturday in March and tells you about it in December.' He laughs. 'The technology is unrecognisable. The people are identical. That's why I'm still here.'

InterviewBookmakerRacing Culture

Related Stories